This week, we reprint a valuable article by Professor Alon Tal, published in The Times of Israel on 25 March, on the connection between overpopulation and the coronavirus pandemic. Professor Tal explains the relationships between population density, human encroachment on natural areas, and disease transmission, and also the situation in Israel, a densely populated country. The text is relevant for many other places: more than 15 countries have even higher population densities than Israel, and India is almost as densely populated. Moreover, there are hundreds of overcrowded mega-cities around the world, of relevance to this text. For another valuable discussion of the connection between density, disease transmission and population policy, see this recent article by American environmentalist Gary Wockner.
By Alon Tal
Overcrowding and population density are indirect factors in a pandemic’s reach, and they are as important to its impact as its pathology.
On morning runs inside Modi’in, during the past year or two, I have encountered wild boars, jackals, turtles and hedgehogs. After 20 years of running the same trails, it is a new experience. More and more, Israeli communities find themselves in direct contact with wild animals whose habitat is usurped by humans. They simply have no place else to go. When the surrounding hyena population discovered the ample food supply in Modi’in garbage cans, they became an exciting attraction for our otherwise sleepy bedroom town. Notwithstanding the thrill in seeing wild animals up close, it does not bode well.
We all have a clear notion of how the present coronavirus epidemic unfolded and its proximate causes. The zoonotic nature of the virus is widely accepted. The social mechanisms of the illness’s rapid transmission also are well understood. But it seems that we have not really apprehended the role that overcrowding and population density play as critical indirect drivers in the pandemic pathology. There are two main factors at play.
The first is that an increasingly crowded world is witnessing outbreaks of zoonotic viruses with growing frequency. The rate of infectious disease epidemics has quadrupled over the past 50 years. Based on the locations of these viral hotspots, the new dynamics are often attributed to the steady encroachment by humans on wildlife habitat.
Experts confirm that the COVID-19 virus evolved in an animal host and then “jumped over” to infect people. This is the way several recent epidemics began. If one considers the broader pathology, the present coronavirus outbreak is part of an imbalance between human beings and our natural world.
Recent pandemics emerged from East Asia and Africa, places where people increasingly come in contact with wildlife populations. There are grave implications. That’s why China recently decided to ban trade and consumption of wild animals, a welcome step — for both public health and biodiversity protection
While China’s population is finally starting to stabilize, the overall demographic patterns in the country are not changing: hundreds of millions of people have joined an unprecedented rural-urban migration. Wuhan – where the coronavirus plague began – is an example: In 1985, there were 2.5 million people living in the city; today — well over 11 million.
As the city expanded and sprawled, natural lands gave way to human settlement. The surrounding Hebei region suffers from acute deforestation. Those animals surviving need to go somewhere. As urban and suburban development proliferated, interactions with humans increased.
The second way growing population density drives the coronavirus pandemic involves the way the virus is transmitted. Epidemiologists have long relied on the reproduction number — or in technical jargon: R0 – (R naught) to design strategies for confronting infectious disease. R0 is defined as the number of cases, on average, an infected person causes during their infectious period. If that number falls below 1, the epidemic wanes. A disease with a high R0 spreads quickly.
Measles is a particularly contagious illness — with an R0 of 12 to 18. Estimates for the infectiousness of COVID-19 are lower and have been reported to span 1.4 -3.8. It is well to consider the reasons behind these broad ranges.
Many factors determining R0 are beyond our control. These include the infectiousness of the agent; its incubation period; and mode of transmission. One critical factor, however, is not built-in biologically: population density. When people live in dispersed rural environments, there is less human interaction and lower transmission.
COVID-19 is transmitted via airborne droplets. People must be near someone already infected to catch the virus. Reducing the effective population density in public meeting places is the basic rationale behind the quarantine strategy favored by most countries responding to the outbreak. But as more and more people live in crowded cities, it becomes harder to control a pathogen that takes days to manifest.
These two demographic factors influencing epidemic dynamics — human encroachment on habitat and denser living conditions — are especially germane in Israel. For decades, we have hemorrhaged open spaces, with human settlement supplanting habitats and farm lands. Recently, Israel’s ecological agencies published their bi-annual “State of Nature” report. Among its conclusions: “The rate of land-cover conversion between 2014–2017 was the highest in the last 20 years, during which, approximately 55 km2 were converted from open landscapes into built-up areas.”
Even counting the Negev, Israel is among the world’s most densely populated countries. Population momentum will probably double our numbers during the next 30 years. For those who rely on public transportation, enjoy cultural events and utilize public venues — physical proximity to other people will increase. There will be even greater demands on our overrun hospitals. Already today, large Israeli families, confined to small apartments are finding it very hard to respect quarantine restrictions. This challenge will also grow harder. In short, we can expect our country to become ever more vulnerable, should pandemic dynamics arise in the future. Unfortunately, it is likely that they will.
This is a time when economist Milton Friedman’s observation is frequently quoted: “Only a crisis – actual or perceived – produces real change. When that crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around.” When the coronavirus pandemic subsides and Israel looks for lessons, adopting a strategy to stabilize the population is an important idea that needs to be on the table.
About the Author:
Professor Alon Tal, is the chair of the Tel Aviv University Department of Public Policy and a veteran environmental activist. Alon Tal is the author of “The Land is Full: Addressing Overpopulation in Israel” (2016), see https://overpopulation-project.com/books/
This article was originally published in The Times of Israel on 25 March 2020.
4 thoughts on “The disconcerting association between overpopulation and the COVID-19 crisis”
London and other densely populated areas here in the UK, are hot spots for Covid-19 transmission.
Social tensions are increasing in rural neighbourhoods, driven by locals’ resentment of influxes of second home and camper van owners.
Professor Tal’s analysis is to be welcomed for its good sense and warnings for the future.
My initial thoughts, when the epidemic evolved to a pandemic, was that this was directly related to human population pressure and increasing encroachment on hitherto undeveloped land and water sources.
China has now reopened the atrocious and barbaric wet markets; will they never learn?
Meanwhile, the self righteous proponents of open borders in the EU and the msm, have quietly abandoned their demands.
I think it is a hard sell to say that overpopulation is the cause of people living closer together since we have always had cities even when the population was half what it is. The main problem is that the resources to deal with the problem are thinner.
Overpopulation is the cause of overpopulated cities, not the cause of people living closer together in general. You cannot compare the cities from before the population explosion with the current megacities that have a much higher population density, total population size and surface.
But it is not only a question about the human population density, but also about wildlife population density. A large city in the middle of recently destroyed natural habitat or still surrounded by natural habitat is the perfect place for the emergence of a zoonotic virus. Such a virus will emerge much less likely in a European city since there is simply no natural habitat left around the cities.
This article comes to a bit of a daunting end, but it certainly makes you think. There will be a point where we simply can not populate the earth further, we have already noticed the negative consequences from overpopulation for for the natural world and for us in cities and rural areas. I think there will be a huge ethical decision that needs to be made concerning population stabilization and I certainly think COVID-19 is accelerating this process. Although I don’t want to imagine a world where peoples freedoms are limited in ways that might aid in population stabilization – these days could be closer than we think.