Demography and reproductive rights are environmental issues: Insights from sub-Saharan Africa

Rapid population growth impacts many social, economic, and environmental issues, and sub-Saharan Africa is the fastest growing region in the world. Céline Delacroix and Nkechi S. Owoo asked stakeholders in the region how important they think population growth is as a factor in meeting the region’s challenges.

By Céline Delacroix

Sub-Saharan Africa’s population is growing three times faster than the rest of the world with an average of 4.6 births per woman in 2021. By comparison, the fertility rate in Canada was 1.3 births per woman in 2022.

The region is projected to continue to be the fastest growing in the world, with a population increasing from 1.2 billion in 2021 to 2.1 billion in 2050.

Sustained and rapid population growth has deep implications for development, exacerbating social, economic and environmental challenges from food insecurity and gender inequity to environmental degradation.

At the same time, Sub-Saharan Africa also has a disproportionate vulnerability to climate change and environmental degradation. It is critical that population dynamics and reproductive health be at the forefront of ongoing environmental discussions

A busy street in Ghana.

Population dynamics and environment

There are many just and humane ways to slow the pace of rapid population growth while also respecting human rights and the need for economic development. Key to this goal is advancing reproductive rights, gender equity and education.

Advancing reproductive autonomy by ensuring that individuals have the means to choose the timing and frequency of childbearing carries significant benefits for climate change resilience and environmental sustainability.

As individuals are given the means to choose the number, timing and spacing of their children, they tend to have fewer children.

It is estimated that if the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals target for contraceptive use and education are met, global population size would decline from today’s 8 billion to 6.29 billion in 2100. If not, then the United Nations medium projection of 10.3 billion appears more likely.

Yet, despite their far-ranging implications for environmental sustainability, demographic trajectories are largely omitted or regarded as set in stone by the development and environmental communities. This makes for a missed opportunity for transformative change.

Discussions that highlight the negative impacts of global population growth are also often marginalized and perceived as unwarranted, alarmist, coercive and racist. At the same time, it is important to remember that high birth rates should not carry the stigma of blame but instead be seen within the lens of wider socio-economic issues.

We live in a demographically divided world. Some regions of the planet are experiencing sustained population growth, while others are witnessing relative stability and even decline.

In this context concerns about population growth can appear to have limited global application, making it more challenging to express alarm over increasing human numbers in relation to population declines elsewhere

However, this does not mean that exponential human growth cannot pose concerns in some regions.

Sub-Saharan perspectives

As a researcher in the emerging field of planetary health, I study the nexus of reproductive rights, population dynamics and environmental sustainability.

In collaboration with Nkechi S. Owoo, from the University of Ghana, we set out to explore stakeholder perceptions around these issues. We were surprised to learn that sub-Saharan Africans perspectives had not been individually documented, despite their unique relevance.

Our study included a survey and follow-up interviews with 402 participants from 42 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The results would surprise many observers who may doubt that population growth is a concern in Africa.

While there were geographic and gender limitations in our sample size — and more research will be required to further explore this topic — we nevertheless feel that our findings provide useful insights into wide-ranging public concern for population growth. Respondents overwhelmingly perceived population growth as a phenomenon representing challenges to environmental sustainability, economic and social goals, peace and security.

Over 90% of respondents were in agreement that population growth has a negative impact on food security, environmental sustainability, migration patterns, resilience, health and wellbeing, peace and security, education, disaster preparedness, and economic development. 78% also agreed that population growth has a negative impact on gender equity
Percentage of respondents that agreed on the effects of population on welfare outcomes. Graph from Delacroix and Owoo (2023)

Many participants expressed the view that population dynamics ought to be integrated in policies and discussions aimed at improving or preserving the quality of the environment. One respondent in particular stated that

“population dynamics should always be put at the forefront whenever climate and the environment are being discussed”.

A small number of participants argued that population growth was not a driver of environmental degradation and climate change, which was attributed to the excessive consumption habits and disproportionate responsibility of the Global North.

The large majority of our respondents, however, held a different view. They felt that the disproportionate role of consumption did not preclude acknowledging the role of population growth in generating environmental degradation.

A survey participant from South Africa, for example, stated that:

“The cumulative impact of 1 billion low per-capita footprints still equals a high impact. This is not to discount the high impact of people that may have lower fertility rates and higher per-capita footprints — who are as important to address.”

Participants overwhelmingly felt reproductive health and rights, alongside education and women empowerment considerations, ought to be integrated in environmental sustainability discussions and policies.

They agreed with the notion that contraception and family planning services can have a positive impact on environmental sustainability. They also agreed that integrating family planning as an environmental policy would contribute to accelerating much needed progress on reproductive rights and sustainability.

It is time to discuss demography

This study presents surprising evidence that rebuts common assumptions about the sensitivity of discussing population trends in developing countries.

Our survey suggests that a majority of those working in a field that is related to economic, social, or environmental development in sub-Saharan Africa consider the topic of population growth important.

Our study also supports the importance of amplifying the voices of people among those most exposed to rapid population growth and most vulnerable to climate change and environmental degradation. These individuals, more often than not, live in places where gender equity and access to family planning face significant challenges.

Most of our research respondents are concerned by population growth because of its negative environmental and social implications, and wish to integrate demographic and reproductive rights and gender equity considerations in environmental discourses and policies.

Similar calls to stabilize and gradually decrease the human population by supporting reproductive autonomy and gender equity are regularly issued by leading environmental scientists, and must be prioritized to achieve the transformative change needed for sustainability.

This article was originally published February 7 by The Conversation.

Published

7 responses to “Demography and reproductive rights are environmental issues: Insights from sub-Saharan Africa”

  1. gaiabaracetti Avatar

    “The results would surprise many observers who may doubt that population growth is a concern in Africa” – those observers are usually virtue-signalling Western “environmentalists” such as George Monbiot, or occasionally Western-obsessed elites from those same places. People who actually have to deal with things like slums, mass unemployment and poverty, as much as they certainly also like to put the blame elsewhere, cannot afford to be so delusional.
    https://populationmatters.org/news/2024/02/nigerias-population-explosion-what-do-people-think/

  2. PHILIP CAFARO Avatar

    Note: 99% of respondents agreed that population growth has a negative impact on food security. Doubling or tripling Africa’s population while climate change potentially reduces agricultural productivity is flirting with disaster. It’s obvious.

  3. Aroop Mangalik Avatar

    Thank you, you have brought up many important issues
    Aroop Mangalik

  4. Stable Genius Avatar

    If this is really what Sub Saharans think, and I have no reason to doubt it, it’s tragic that the fakery of UN Net Zero Emissions is the only environmental show in town.

    1. gaiabaracetti Avatar

      It is also surprising that they still have so many children if they are really this aware of how dangerous it is. But then again, our countries are full of people who worry about climate change and are on a plane every other week, so…

      1. Frank Avatar

        Well, questions were not posed to the average person in SSA, but rather a sub-set of the elite. So, not so surprising, but of course one would hope that such guys could influence citizens.
        In an interview a few years ago, Bill Ryerson at Population Media Center (a good organization!), gave four reasons why birth rates are high in SSA.
        1. People, also women, want many children – “the norm”, just as in Europe 100-150 years ago
        2. Many people pick up rumors that modern contraceptives are dangerous, can make you sterile, etc
        3. Patriarchy, combined with
        4. Religion / religiosity
        One could also add costs; for poor people, contraceptives / clinics are not, or are rarely free. And sometimes people need to travel long distances.

  5. Tango George Avatar

    Until people really care about this planet they will continue to ignore facts in plain sight..Commentor Frank did list it and if I had a list this would be the only number on my list.I am in my 9th decade so I have seen alot of degradation..and by far religion has to be #1..In many african countries women have to cover their bodies with sheets and submit to anything a man wants and may be pregnate at age 11 and continue into her 30s Islam has no tolerance for women they are animals..In USA its Christians and abortion They want rights for the unborn fetus but not for the woman.She is threatened with all kinds of stuff like being charged with murder or burning in Hell.
    Then the christians bring and hide Illegal aliens from countries whose people believe in having too many children to compound matters and all these people want land-houses-cars etc which destroys the enviorment and I do not see an end to this that will save this planet…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NOTE: Comments with more than one link will be held in wait and will only become visible on the site after an admin has approved it.

Explore the content and topics covered by TOP, search here

Blog categories
Gallery of infographics – Learn more about overpopulation and environment

Discover more from The Overpopulation Project

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading